Fish LingcodvsMilk Whole 3.25% Milkfat With Added Vitamin D

Fish Lingcod has more protein, Milk Whole 3.25% Milkfat With Added Vitamin D is lower in calories, while Fish Lingcod is leaner.

🎯When to Eat What

Goal-based picks for Fish Lingcod vs Milk Whole 3.25% Milkfat With Added Vitamin D

⚖️Watching your weight

Go with Milk Whole 3.25% Milkfat With Added Vitamin D at just 60 kcal per 100g — 29% fewer calories.

🫄Staying full longer

Fish Lingcod will keep you satisfied longer with 17.7g protein — fat and protein slow digestion while fiber adds bulk, keeping hunger at bay.

🥛Nutrient absorption

Milk Whole 3.25% Milkfat With Added Vitamin D's natural fat (3.2g/100g) helps your body absorb fat-soluble nutrients like vitamin A and vitamin D and calcium — not all fat is bad, moderate amounts are essential.

💪Building muscle

Fish Lingcod packs 17.7g of protein per 100g (83% of calories from protein) — the better pick for muscle growth and recovery.

❤️Heart health

Fish Lingcod is the heart-friendlier option with lower saturated fat, more potassium.

🍌Electrolytes & cramp prevention

Fish Lingcod provides 437mg of potassium per 100g — important for muscle function, hydration, and blood pressure.

🔥Calorie Breakdown

Fish Lingcod
85kcal
Protein88%
Carbs0%
Fat12%
Milk Whole 3.25% Milkfat With Added Vitamin D
60kcal
Protein22%
Carbs31%
Fat47%

💪Macronutrient Comparison

Fish LingcodMilk Whole 3.25% Milkfat With Added Vitamin D
ProteinA Wins
18g
3.3g
CarbohydratesB Wins
0g
4.6g
Total FatA Wins
1.1g
3.2g
Dietary Fiber
0g

📊Full Nutrition Comparison

NutrientFish LingcodMilk Whole 3.25% Milkfat With Added Vitamin DDiff
💪Macronutrients
Calories85kcal4%60kcal3%+25kcal
Protein18g35%3.3g7%+14g
Total Fat1.1g1%3.2g4%<0.1g
Saturated Fat0.20g1%1.9g9%<0.1g
Trans Fat0.11g
Cholesterol52mg17%12mg4%+40mg
Carbohydrates0g0%4.6g2%<0.1g
Dietary Fiber0g0%
Vitamins
Vitamin A15mcg2%32mcg4%<0.1mcg
Vitamin C0mg0%
Vitamin D0.96mcg5%
Vitamin E<0.1mg0%
Vitamin B60.30mg18%<0.1mg4%+0.24mg
Vitamin B123.6mcg150%0.54mcg23%+3.1mcg
Folate9.0mcg2%0mcg0%+9.0mcg
Thiamin (B1)<0.1mg3%<0.1mg5%<0.1mg
Riboflavin (B2)0.11mg9%0.14mg11%<0.1mg
Niacin (B3)1.9mg12%0.10mg1%+1.8mg
🔶Minerals
Sodium59mg3%38mg2%+21mg
Calcium14mg1%123mg9%<0.1mg
Iron0.32mg2%0mg0%+0.32mg
Potassium437mg9%150mg3%+287mg
Phosphorus201mg16%101mg8%+100mg
Magnesium26mg6%12mg3%+14mg
Zinc0.45mg4%0.42mg4%+<0.1mg
Copper<0.1mg3%<0.1mg0%+<0.1mg
Manganese<0.1mg1%0mg0%+<0.1mg
Selenium37mcg66%1.9mcg3%+35mcg

🔬Nutritional Analysis

Calories: Milk Whole 3.25% Milkfat With Added Vitamin D is significantly lower in calories at just 60 kcal per 100g compared to 85 kcal for Fish Lingcod — that's 42% fewer calories, making Milk Whole 3.25% Milkfat With Added Vitamin D the better choice for calorie-conscious diets.

Protein: Fish Lingcod provides more protein with 17.7g versus 3.27g per 100g. In terms of protein-to-calorie efficiency, Fish Lingcod offers better value for building and maintaining muscle.

Fat: Fish Lingcod is the leaner option with 1.06g of total fat per 100g compared to 3.2g. Fish Lingcod has less saturated fat (0.197g vs 1.86g).

Key Vitamins: The most notable vitamin differences are in Folate (Fish Lingcod: 9mcg vs 0mcg), Niacin (B3) (Fish Lingcod: 1.9mg vs 0.105mg), Vitamin B12 (Fish Lingcod: 3.6mcg vs 0.54mcg).

Key Minerals: Notable mineral differences include Iron (Fish Lingcod: 0.32mg vs 0mg), Manganese (Fish Lingcod: 0.02mg vs 0mg), Copper (Fish Lingcod: 0.027mg vs 0.001mg).

Diet Suitability: Both fit a low-carb or keto diet. Fish Lingcod fits a low-fat diet. Both fit a low-sodium diet.

🔗Related Comparisons

Data from USDA FoodData Central. All values per 100g.