Fish LingcodvsFish Tuna Salad
🎯When to Eat What
Goal-based picks for Fish Lingcod vs Fish Tuna Salad
Go with Fish Lingcod at just 85 kcal per 100g — 55% fewer calories.
Fish Tuna Salad will keep you satisfied longer with 16g protein, 9.26g fat — fat and protein slow digestion while fiber adds bulk, keeping hunger at bay.
Fish Lingcod is the heart-friendlier option with lower saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium.
Fish Lingcod provides 437mg of potassium per 100g — important for muscle function, hydration, and blood pressure.
🔥Calorie Breakdown
💪Macronutrient Comparison
📊Full Nutrition Comparison
| Nutrient | Fish Lingcod | Fish Tuna Salad | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💪Macronutrients | |||
| Calories | 85kcal4% | 187kcal9% | <0.1kcal |
| Protein | 18g35% | 16g32% | +1.7g |
| Total Fat | 1.1g1% | 9.3g12% | <0.1g |
| Saturated Fat | 0.20g1% | 1.5g8% | <0.1g |
| Cholesterol | 52mg17% | 13mg4% | +39mg |
| Carbohydrates | 0g0% | 9.4g3% | <0.1g |
| Dietary Fiber | 0g0% | 0g0% | — |
| ✨Vitamins | |||
| Vitamin A | 15mcg2% | 24mcg3% | <0.1mcg |
| Vitamin C | 0mg0% | 2.2mg2% | <0.1mg |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.30mg18% | <0.1mg5% | +0.22mg |
| Vitamin B12 | 3.6mcg150% | 1.2mcg50% | +2.4mcg |
| Folate | 9.0mcg2% | 8.0mcg2% | +1.0mcg |
| Thiamin (B1) | <0.1mg3% | <0.1mg3% | <0.1mg |
| Riboflavin (B2) | 0.11mg9% | <0.1mg5% | +<0.1mg |
| Niacin (B3) | 1.9mg12% | 6.7mg42% | <0.1mg |
| 🔶Minerals | |||
| Sodium | 59mg3% | 402mg17% | <0.1mg |
| Calcium | 14mg1% | 17mg1% | <0.1mg |
| Iron | 0.32mg2% | 1.0mg6% | <0.1mg |
| Potassium | 437mg9% | 178mg4% | +259mg |
| Phosphorus | 201mg16% | 178mg14% | +23mg |
| Magnesium | 26mg6% | 19mg5% | +7.0mg |
| Zinc | 0.45mg4% | 0.56mg5% | <0.1mg |
| Copper | <0.1mg3% | 0.14mg16% | <0.1mg |
| Manganese | <0.1mg1% | <0.1mg2% | <0.1mg |
| Selenium | 37mcg66% | 41mcg75% | <0.1mcg |
🔬Nutritional Analysis
Calories: Fish Lingcod is significantly lower in calories at just 85 kcal per 100g compared to 187 kcal for Fish Tuna Salad — that's 120% fewer calories, making Fish Lingcod the better choice for calorie-conscious diets.
Protein: Fish Lingcod provides more protein with 17.7g versus 16g per 100g. In terms of protein-to-calorie efficiency, Fish Lingcod offers better value for building and maintaining muscle.
Fat: Fish Tuna Salad has more fat (9.26g vs 1.06g per 100g), but the combination of fat and protein makes it more satiating — dietary fat helps absorb fat-soluble vitamins (A, D, E, K) and supports hormone balance. Fish Lingcod has less saturated fat (0.197g vs 1.54g).
Key Vitamins: The most notable vitamin differences are in Vitamin C (Fish Tuna Salad: 2.2mg vs 0mg), Vitamin B6 (Fish Lingcod: 0.3mg vs 0.081mg), Niacin (B3) (Fish Tuna Salad: 6.7mg vs 1.9mg).
Key Minerals: Notable mineral differences include Sodium (Fish Tuna Salad: 402mg vs 59mg), Copper (Fish Tuna Salad: 0.145mg vs 0.027mg), Iron (Fish Tuna Salad: 1mg vs 0.32mg).
Diet Suitability: Fish Lingcod fits a low-carb or keto diet. Fish Lingcod fits a low-fat diet. Fish Lingcod fits a low-sodium diet.