Fish LingcodvsQuinoa
🎯When to Eat What
Goal-based picks for Fish Lingcod vs Quinoa
Go with Fish Lingcod at just 85 kcal per 100g — 29% fewer calories.
Fish Lingcod will keep you satisfied longer with 17.7g protein — fat and protein slow digestion while fiber adds bulk, keeping hunger at bay.
Fish Lingcod packs 17.7g of protein per 100g (83% of calories from protein) — the better pick for muscle growth and recovery.
Quinoa with 21g of carbs per 100g provides fast-acting energy — a good pick before a workout or when you need a quick boost.
Quinoa is the heart-friendlier option with less sodium, more fiber.
Fish Lingcod provides 437mg of potassium per 100g — important for muscle function, hydration, and blood pressure.
🔥Calorie Breakdown
💪Macronutrient Comparison
📊Full Nutrition Comparison
| Nutrient | Fish Lingcod | Quinoa | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💪Macronutrients | |||
| Calories | 85kcal4% | 120kcal6% | <0.1kcal |
| Protein | 18g35% | 4.4g9% | +13g |
| Total Fat | 1.1g1% | 1.9g2% | <0.1g |
| Saturated Fat | 0.20g1% | 0.23g1% | <0.1g |
| Cholesterol | 52mg17% | 0mg0% | +52mg |
| Carbohydrates | 0g0% | 21g8% | <0.1g |
| Dietary Fiber | 0g0% | 2.8g10% | <0.1g |
| Sugars | — | 0.87g | — |
| ✨Vitamins | |||
| Vitamin A | 15mcg2% | 0mcg0% | +15mcg |
| Vitamin C | 0mg0% | 0mg0% | — |
| Vitamin D | — | 0mcg0% | — |
| Vitamin E | — | 0.63mg4% | — |
| Vitamin K | — | 0mcg0% | — |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.30mg18% | 0.12mg7% | +0.18mg |
| Vitamin B12 | 3.6mcg150% | 0mcg0% | +3.6mcg |
| Folate | 9.0mcg2% | 42mcg11% | <0.1mcg |
| Thiamin (B1) | <0.1mg3% | 0.11mg9% | <0.1mg |
| Riboflavin (B2) | 0.11mg9% | 0.11mg8% | +<0.1mg |
| Niacin (B3) | 1.9mg12% | 0.41mg3% | +1.5mg |
| 🔶Minerals | |||
| Sodium | 59mg3% | 7.0mg0% | +52mg |
| Calcium | 14mg1% | 17mg1% | <0.1mg |
| Iron | 0.32mg2% | 1.5mg8% | <0.1mg |
| Potassium | 437mg9% | 172mg4% | +265mg |
| Phosphorus | 201mg16% | 152mg12% | +49mg |
| Magnesium | 26mg6% | 64mg15% | <0.1mg |
| Zinc | 0.45mg4% | 1.1mg10% | <0.1mg |
| Copper | <0.1mg3% | 0.19mg21% | <0.1mg |
| Manganese | <0.1mg1% | 0.63mg27% | <0.1mg |
| Selenium | 37mcg66% | 2.8mcg5% | +34mcg |
🔬Nutritional Analysis
Calories: Fish Lingcod is significantly lower in calories at just 85 kcal per 100g compared to 120 kcal for Quinoa — that's 41% fewer calories, making Fish Lingcod the better choice for calorie-conscious diets.
Protein: Fish Lingcod provides more protein with 17.7g versus 4.4g per 100g. In terms of protein-to-calorie efficiency, Fish Lingcod offers better value for building and maintaining muscle.
Fat: Fish Lingcod is the leaner option with 1.06g of total fat per 100g compared to 1.92g.
Key Vitamins: The most notable vitamin differences are in Vitamin A (Fish Lingcod: 15mcg vs 0mcg), Vitamin B12 (Fish Lingcod: 3.6mcg vs 0mcg), Folate (Quinoa: 42mcg vs 9mcg).
Key Minerals: Notable mineral differences include Manganese (Quinoa: 0.631mg vs 0.02mg), Selenium (Fish Lingcod: 36.5mcg vs 2.8mcg), Sodium (Fish Lingcod: 59mg vs 7mg).
Diet Suitability: Fish Lingcod fits a low-carb or keto diet. Both fit a low-fat diet. Both fit a low-sodium diet.