Fish LingcodvsTomato Powder
🎯When to Eat What
Goal-based picks for Fish Lingcod vs Tomato Powder
Go with Fish Lingcod at just 85 kcal per 100g — 72% fewer calories.
Tomato Powder will keep you satisfied longer with 16.5g fiber, 12.9g protein — fat and protein slow digestion while fiber adds bulk, keeping hunger at bay.
Tomato Powder has both iron (4.56mg) and vitamin C (117mg) — vitamin C can boost iron absorption by up to 6x, making this a naturally efficient pairing.
Fish Lingcod packs 17.7g of protein per 100g (83% of calories from protein) — the better pick for muscle growth and recovery.
Tomato Powder is the heart-friendlier option with lower saturated fat, more fiber, more potassium.
Tomato Powder provides 1930mg of potassium per 100g — important for muscle function, hydration, and blood pressure.
🔥Calorie Breakdown
💪Macronutrient Comparison
📊Full Nutrition Comparison
| Nutrient | Fish Lingcod | Tomato Powder | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💪Macronutrients | |||
| Calories | 85kcal4% | 302kcal15% | <0.1kcal |
| Protein | 18g35% | 13g26% | +4.8g |
| Total Fat | 1.1g1% | 0.44g1% | +0.62g |
| Saturated Fat | 0.20g1% | <0.1g0% | +0.14g |
| Trans Fat | — | 0g | — |
| Cholesterol | 52mg17% | 0mg0% | +52mg |
| Carbohydrates | 0g0% | 75g27% | <0.1g |
| Dietary Fiber | 0g0% | 17g59% | <0.1g |
| Sugars | — | 44g | — |
| ✨Vitamins | |||
| Vitamin A | 15mcg2% | 862mcg96% | <0.1mcg |
| Vitamin C | 0mg0% | 117mg130% | <0.1mg |
| Vitamin D | — | 0mcg0% | — |
| Vitamin E | — | 12mg81% | — |
| Vitamin K | — | 49mcg41% | — |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.30mg18% | 0.46mg27% | <0.1mg |
| Vitamin B12 | 3.6mcg150% | 0mcg0% | +3.6mcg |
| Folate | 9.0mcg2% | 120mcg30% | <0.1mcg |
| Thiamin (B1) | <0.1mg3% | 0.91mg76% | <0.1mg |
| Riboflavin (B2) | 0.11mg9% | 0.76mg59% | <0.1mg |
| Niacin (B3) | 1.9mg12% | 9.1mg57% | <0.1mg |
| 🔶Minerals | |||
| Sodium | 59mg3% | 134mg6% | <0.1mg |
| Calcium | 14mg1% | 166mg13% | <0.1mg |
| Iron | 0.32mg2% | 4.6mg25% | <0.1mg |
| Potassium | 437mg9% | 1930mg41% | <0.1mg |
| Phosphorus | 201mg16% | 295mg24% | <0.1mg |
| Magnesium | 26mg6% | 178mg42% | <0.1mg |
| Zinc | 0.45mg4% | 1.7mg16% | <0.1mg |
| Copper | <0.1mg3% | 1.2mg138% | <0.1mg |
| Manganese | <0.1mg1% | 1.9mg85% | <0.1mg |
| Selenium | 37mcg66% | 5.3mcg10% | +31mcg |
🔬Nutritional Analysis
Calories: Fish Lingcod is significantly lower in calories at just 85 kcal per 100g compared to 302 kcal for Tomato Powder — that's 255% fewer calories, making Fish Lingcod the better choice for calorie-conscious diets.
Protein: Fish Lingcod provides more protein with 17.7g versus 12.9g per 100g. In terms of protein-to-calorie efficiency, Fish Lingcod offers better value for building and maintaining muscle.
Fat: Fish Lingcod has more fat (1.06g vs 0.44g per 100g), but the combination of fat and protein makes it more satiating — dietary fat helps absorb fat-soluble vitamins (A, D, E, K) and supports hormone balance.
Key Vitamins: The most notable vitamin differences are in Vitamin C (Tomato Powder: 117mg vs 0mg), Vitamin B12 (Fish Lingcod: 3.6mcg vs 0mcg), Vitamin A (Tomato Powder: 862mcg vs 15mcg).
Key Minerals: Notable mineral differences include Manganese (Tomato Powder: 1.95mg vs 0.02mg), Copper (Tomato Powder: 1.24mg vs 0.027mg), Iron (Tomato Powder: 4.56mg vs 0.32mg).
Diet Suitability: Fish Lingcod fits a low-carb or keto diet. Both fit a low-fat diet. Both fit a low-sodium diet. Tomato Powder fits a high-fiber diet.