Fish Tuna SaladvsJerusalem-artichokes
🎯When to Eat What
Goal-based picks for Fish Tuna Salad vs Jerusalem-artichokes
Go with Jerusalem-artichokes at just 73 kcal per 100g — 61% fewer calories.
Fish Tuna Salad will keep you satisfied longer with 16g protein, 9.26g fat — fat and protein slow digestion while fiber adds bulk, keeping hunger at bay.
Fish Tuna Salad packs 16g of protein per 100g (34% of calories from protein) — the better pick for muscle growth and recovery.
Jerusalem-artichokes with 17g of carbs per 100g provides fast-acting energy — a good pick before a workout or when you need a quick boost.
Jerusalem-artichokes is the heart-friendlier option with lower saturated fat, less sodium, more fiber, more potassium.
Jerusalem-artichokes provides 429mg of potassium per 100g — important for muscle function, hydration, and blood pressure.
🔥Calorie Breakdown
💪Macronutrient Comparison
📊Full Nutrition Comparison
| Nutrient | Fish Tuna Salad | Jerusalem-artichokes | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💪Macronutrients | |||
| Calories | 187kcal9% | 73kcal4% | +114kcal |
| Protein | 16g32% | 2.0g4% | +14g |
| Total Fat | 9.3g12% | <0.1g0% | +9.3g |
| Saturated Fat | 1.5g8% | 0g0% | +1.5g |
| Trans Fat | — | 0g | — |
| Cholesterol | 13mg4% | 0mg0% | +13mg |
| Carbohydrates | 9.4g3% | 17g6% | <0.1g |
| Dietary Fiber | 0g0% | 1.6g6% | <0.1g |
| Sugars | — | 9.6g | — |
| ✨Vitamins | |||
| Vitamin A | 24mcg3% | 1.0mcg0% | +23mcg |
| Vitamin C | 2.2mg2% | 4.0mg4% | <0.1mg |
| Vitamin D | — | 0mcg0% | — |
| Vitamin E | — | 0.19mg1% | — |
| Vitamin K | — | 0.10mcg0% | — |
| Vitamin B6 | <0.1mg5% | <0.1mg5% | +<0.1mg |
| Vitamin B12 | 1.2mcg50% | 0mcg0% | +1.2mcg |
| Folate | 8.0mcg2% | 13mcg3% | <0.1mcg |
| Thiamin (B1) | <0.1mg3% | 0.20mg17% | <0.1mg |
| Riboflavin (B2) | <0.1mg5% | <0.1mg5% | +<0.1mg |
| Niacin (B3) | 6.7mg42% | 1.3mg8% | +5.4mg |
| 🔶Minerals | |||
| Sodium | 402mg17% | 4.0mg0% | +398mg |
| Calcium | 17mg1% | 14mg1% | +3.0mg |
| Iron | 1.0mg6% | 3.4mg19% | <0.1mg |
| Potassium | 178mg4% | 429mg9% | <0.1mg |
| Phosphorus | 178mg14% | 78mg6% | +100mg |
| Magnesium | 19mg5% | 17mg4% | +2.0mg |
| Zinc | 0.56mg5% | 0.12mg1% | +0.44mg |
| Copper | 0.14mg16% | 0.14mg16% | +<0.1mg |
| Manganese | <0.1mg2% | <0.1mg3% | <0.1mg |
| Selenium | 41mcg75% | 0.70mcg1% | +41mcg |
🔬Nutritional Analysis
Calories: Jerusalem-artichokes is significantly lower in calories at just 73 kcal per 100g compared to 187 kcal for Fish Tuna Salad — that's 156% fewer calories, making Jerusalem-artichokes the better choice for calorie-conscious diets.
Protein: Fish Tuna Salad provides more protein with 16g versus 2g per 100g. In terms of protein-to-calorie efficiency, Fish Tuna Salad offers better value for building and maintaining muscle.
Fat: Fish Tuna Salad has more fat (9.26g vs 0.01g per 100g), but the combination of fat and protein makes it more satiating — dietary fat helps absorb fat-soluble vitamins (A, D, E, K) and supports hormone balance. Jerusalem-artichokes has less saturated fat (0g vs 1.54g).
Key Vitamins: The most notable vitamin differences are in Vitamin B12 (Fish Tuna Salad: 1.2mcg vs 0mcg), Vitamin A (Fish Tuna Salad: 24mcg vs 1mcg), Thiamin (B1) (Jerusalem-artichokes: 0.2mg vs 0.031mg).
Key Minerals: Notable mineral differences include Sodium (Fish Tuna Salad: 402mg vs 4mg), Selenium (Fish Tuna Salad: 41.2mcg vs 0.7mcg), Zinc (Fish Tuna Salad: 0.56mg vs 0.12mg).
Diet Suitability: Jerusalem-artichokes fits a low-fat diet. Jerusalem-artichokes fits a low-sodium diet.